TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Donald MacFarlane and James Fogle v. Kay Walter and Kenneth Ducharme

MacFarlane v. Walter, 216 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2000)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 7, 2000
Docket
No. 97-35725
Citations
216 F.3d 8812000 Daily Journal DAR 73542000 WL 9600742000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 55372000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658

Opinion

216 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2000)

DONALD MACFARLANE and JAMES FOGLE, Petitioners-Appellants, v. KAY WALTER and KENNETH DUCHARME, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-35725

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Filed July 7, 2000

D.C. No. CV-96-05688-FDB

Before: Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

1

Prior report: 120 S.CT 1959.

ORDER 2

Pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court of the United States, the case is dismissed as moot.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2000: 120002026peak 2000 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Corbett v. Brill128 F. Supp. 2d 650 (D. Haw. 2000)

Most recent

  1. Corbett v. Brill128 F. Supp. 2d 650 (D. Haw. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list