TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cathy A. Catterson, U.S. Court of Appeals, Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Housing Authority, and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Housing Authority, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Cathy A. Catterson, U.S. Court of Appeals, Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Hous. Auth., & U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Hous. Auth., U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 222 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2000)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: on reh'g en banc, Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Hous. Auth., & United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., Pearlie Rucker Herman Walker Willie Lee Barbara Hill v. Harold Davis Oakland Hous. Auth., & United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 237 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2001). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 18, 2000
Docket
No. 98-16322
Citations
222 F.3d 614

Opinion

222 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2000)

CATHY A. CATTERSON, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, PEARLIE RUCKER; HERMAN WALKER; WILLIE LEE; BARBARA HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAROLD DAVIS; OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants, and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Appellant. PEARLIE RUCKER; HERMAN WALKER; WILLIE LEE; BARBARA HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAROLD DAVIS; OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, Defendants-Appellants, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant.

No. 98-16322, 98-16542.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

FILED AUGUST 18, 2000

D.C. No. CV-98-00781-CRB

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER 1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Note:

1

Judges Wardlaw and Fisher were recused.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list