TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Samuel G. Eubanks, M.D. v. R. David Stengel, Commonwealth Attorney for Jefferson County, A. B. Chandler, Iii, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, in His Official Capacity and His Successors in Office

Eubanks v. R. David Stengel, Commonwealth Attorney for Jefferson Cnty., A. B. Chandler, Iii, Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth of Ky., 224 F.3d 576 (6th Cir. 2000)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 31, 2000
Docket
No. 98-6671
Citations
224 F.3d 5762000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18277

Opinion

224 F.3d 576 (6th Cir. 2000)

Samuel G. Eubanks, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. R. David Stengel, Commonwealth Attorney for Jefferson County, et al., Defendants, A. B. Chandler, III, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, in his official capacity and his successors in office, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-6671

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Argued: December 15, 1999 Decided and Filed: July 31, 2000

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville. No. 98-00383--John G. Heyburn, II, District Judge.

Kimberly A. Parker, Matthew P. Previn, A. Stephen Hut, Jr., WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING, Washington, D.C., Carrie Y. Flaxman, DECHERT, PRICE & RHOADS, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Eve C. Gartner, PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC., New York, New York, David A. Friedman, FERNANDEZ, FRIEDMAN, GROSSMAN & KOHN, Louisville, Kentucky, Catherine Weiss, Jennifer Dalven, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, New York, New York, for Appellees.

Ann K. Benfield, Louisville, Kentucky, Adam L. Frank, SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL, New York, New York, for Amicus Curiae

Before: GUY and CLAY, Circuit Judges; BECKWITH, * District Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

1

After reviewing the briefs and the record and having heard oral argument, we held this case in abeyance pending the decision by the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart, __ S. Ct. __, 120 S.Ct. 2597 , 147 L.Ed.2d 743 (June 28, 2000). The appeal in Carhart involved a challenge to Nebraska's partial birth abortion statute and presented issues very similar to those involved in this challenge to the Kentucky partial birth abortion statute.

2

After carefully reviewing the decision in Carhart we conclude that it is controlling in this case, and that the district court was correct when it held that the Kentucky statute is unconstitutional.

3

AFFIRMED.

Notes:

* The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000) 407
Eubanks v. Stengel, 224 F.3d 576 (6th Cir. 2000) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list