Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County
TANNER ADVERTISING GROUP, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAYETTE COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellee
Tanner Advert. Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette Cnty., 429 F.3d 1012 (11th Cir. 2005)
Opinion
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County
- Lockridge v. City of Oldsmar, Fla.
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
- Service Employees International Union, Local 3 Rachel Canning Velvet Hazard v. Municipality of Mt. Lebanon
- KH Outdoor, LLC v. CLAY COUNTY, FLA.
- MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.
Most recent
- MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Hillsborough County, Fla.
- Lockridge v. City of Oldsmar, Fla.
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
- Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County
- Service Employees International Union, Local 3 Rachel Canning Velvet Hazard v. Municipality of Mt. Lebanon
- Ser Empl Intl Union v. Mun Mt Lebanon
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.