Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corporation
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd., a Limited Partnership Dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corp., Defendant-Cross-Defendant, and City of Carson, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Crossclaimant-Appellee
Opinion
240 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2001)
CARSON HARBOR VILLAGE, Ltd., a limited partnership dba Carson Harbor Village Mobilhome Park, Plaintiff-counter-defendant Appellant, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, a DELAWARE CORP., Defendant-cross-defendant, and CITY OF CARSON, Defendant-cross-defendant-crossclaimant-Appellee.
Nos. 98-55056 98-55210 98-55213 98-55215 98-55422
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
February 13, 2001
ORDER
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Notes:
1
Judge Wardlaw was recused
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.