United States v. Guillermo Vallejo
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo VALLEJO, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ORDER The opinion filed January 16, 2001, appearing at 237 F.3d 1008 , is amended as follows:
1. On slip opinion page 657, delete footnote 1.
2. Add the following in a footnote (new footnote # 3) after the first sentence of Paragraph 8 in Part III.A.1 on slip opinion page 662:
This case does not involve the Government’s use of “unknowing courier” testimony, in which a law enforcement official testifies that certain drug traffickers do not entrust large quantities of drugs to unknowing transporters.
Therefore, we do not address the admissibility of such testimony.
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 42 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.