TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

the Requested Extradition of Kevin John Artt United States of America v. Kevin John Artt, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Pol Brennan United States of America v. Pol Brennan, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Terence Damien Kirby United States of America v. Terence Damien Kirby

In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Kevin John Artt United States of America v. Kevin John Artt, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Pol Brennan United States of America v. Pol Brennan, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Terence Damien Kirby United States of America v. Terence Damien Kirby

the Requested Extradition of Kevin John Artt United States of Am. v. Kevin John Artt, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Pol Brennan United States of Am. v. Pol Brennan, in the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Terence Damien Kirby United States of Am. v. Terence Damien Kirby, 248 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2001)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 11, 2001
Docket
No. 97-10386
Citations
248 F.3d 11972001 Daily Journal DAR 46652001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 37802001 U.S. App. LEXIS 13482

Opinion

248 F.3d 1197 (9th Cir. 2001)

In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Kevin John Artt United States of America, Appellee, v. Kevin John Artt, Appellant. In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Pol Brennan United States of America, Appellee, v. Pol Brennan, Appellant. In the Matter of the Requested Extradition of Terence Damien Kirby United States of America, Appellee, v. Terence Damien Kirby, Appellant.

Nos. 97-10386, 97-10387, and 97-10390

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 11, 2001

Before: Goodwin, B. Fletcher, and D.W. Nelson, Circuit Judges.

ORDER 1

Upon due consideration, the panel has decided that the Order previously filed October 31, 2000 and the Order previously filed November 17, 2000 are redesignated for publication.

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list