Commonwealth v. M'Cue
The Commonwealth v. Moses M'Cue and Others
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The defendants were indicted in the District Court of Staunton, for an assault and battery, &c., on Charles Rogers and his wife; Rogers was the prosecutor, and petitioned the general court to change the venue to the Sweet Springs, or elsewhere. The application was founded on an affidavit, that the public mind had been prejudiced against the prosecution by the industrious misrepresentations of the defendants and their adherents. The defendants were likewise heard by affidavit, and other evidence, tending to prove that the application for a change of venue was intended to force the defendants into a compromise that had been offered; and that the public mind about the Sweet Springs had been prejudiced against the defendants.
The court, consisting of judges Jones, Nelson and White, June 14th, 1803, decided that the venue should be changed to the district court of Charlottesville.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.