TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buster v. Ruffner

Buster v. Ruffner, 5 Va. 27 (1816)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Virginia · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1816
Citations
5 Va. 27
Headnotes
1. Assumpsit — Declaration—Allegation of Jurisdiction.† —In an action of assumpsit in the Superior Court of a county, the declaration’s laying the venue in a different county, and omitting to state that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the court, is not error sufficient in arrest of judgment. V’See Tllrberville v. Long, 3 H. & M. 809. 2, Same — Several Counts — General Verdict. — A general verdict in assumpsit, assessing entire damages on several counts, none of which are defective, is not erroneous. **íSee Tidd's Pr. 801 — 2.—Lloyd v. Morris, Willes 113, and Rev’d. Code, 1st vol. ch. 76, sec. 38, p. 112.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Th°e appellee brought an action of assump-sit against the appellant in the Supreme Court of Kanawha county. The declaration began with the words, “Virginia, Mason county, to wit, Joseph Ruffner complains of Cl audius Buster, in custody, &c. for that whereas the said Claudius, to wit, on the 1st day of January 1812, at the county aforesaid, was indebted to the said Joseph, &c.” ; in the usual form ; containing three counts, vi», one, in general terms, for money had and received by the defendant, to and for the use of the plaintiff ; another, more specially, for money had and received, in like manner, for the sale of a negro man slave, the property of the plaintiff ; and another upon aquan-turn valebat for the price *of a negro man slave sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. On the plea of non assumpsit, a general verdict was found for the plaintiff, entire damages being assessed : whereupon, the defendant filed errors in arrest of judgment; to wit, “that the declaration is filed as in the county of Mason, and there is no jurisdiction given to this court in said declaration ; that there are two counts, and a verdict returned for three hundred dollars, without designating on which of the counts the jury found.” The Superior Court entered judgment for the plaintiff according to the verdict ; which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, on the 2d of February, 1816.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list