TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Watson ex rel. Watson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Heather WATSON, a minor, By and Through Robert WATSON, her father v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation

Watson ex rel. Watson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
July 8, 1994
Docket
No. 93-03412
Judges
Danahy, Fulmer, Patterson
Citations
639 So. 2d 6871994 Fla. App. LEXIS 66441994 WL 321654

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment in this action for the appellee, defendant below, states that the appellee “shall recover attorneys fees and taxable costs from Plaintiff, HEATHER WATSON, by and through ROBERT WATSON, her father, in the sum of $22,163.50, which shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum and for which sum let execution issue.”

Heather Watson had reached her majority at the time the final judgment was entered. On this appeal she argues that the provision in the final judgment for recovery of attorney’s fees and taxable costs should make it clear that the award is against only Heather Watson and not her father.

When a minor is represented by a parent as “next friend,” the “next friend” is not a party to the action; the real party in interest is the minor. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.210(b); Youngblood v. Taylor, 89 So.2d 503 (Fla.1956); Brown v. Caldwell, 389 So.2d 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

We believe that the final judgment is correctly worded, but affirm with the clarification that the appellee is entitled to recover attorney’s fees and taxable costs from only the plaintiff Heather Watson and not from her father.

Affirmed as clarified.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

2006: 12011: 12018: 120062026peak 2006 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. American Civil Liberties Union v. Miami-Dade County School Board439 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (S.D. Fla. 2006)
  2. Parrish v. Price71 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
  3. PAUL B. KUNZ, as next friend of W.K., a child v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY237 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Most recent

  1. PAUL B. KUNZ, as next friend of W.K., a child v. SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY237 So. 3d 1026 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
  2. Parrish v. Price71 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
  3. American Civil Liberties Union v. Miami-Dade County School Board439 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (S.D. Fla. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Brown v. Caldwell, 389 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list