TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Forbes v. Napolitano

Fred Forbes Margaret Bohn John L. Summers Ann S. Anderson, Stuart R. Snider George Melcher, Jr. Christopher Tisch Planned Parenthood of Centraland Northern Arizona, Inc. Robert Tamis v. Janet Napolitano, in Her Capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona Stephen Neely, in His Capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona

Forbes v. Napolitano, 260 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2001)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 9, 2001
Docket
No. 99-17372
Citations
260 F.3d 11592000 WL 33407082

Opinion

260 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2001)

FRED FORBES; MARGARET BOHN; JOHN L. SUMMERS; ANN S. ANDERSON, STUART R. SNIDER; GEORGE MELCHER, JR.; CHRISTOPHER TISCH; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRALAND NORTHERN ARIZONA, INC.; ROBERT TAMIS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona; STEPHEN NEELY, in his capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 99-17372

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted October 3, 2000--San Francisco, California Filed December 29, 2000 Order Amending Opinion Filed April 11, 2001 Second Amendment Filed August 9, 2001

NOTE: SEE OPINIONS AT 236 F.3d 1009 , AND 247 F.3d 903 .

Bebe J. Anderson, The Center for Reproductive Law & Policy, New York, N.Y. and Michael Owen Miller, Miller Smith LLP, Tucson, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Charles R. Pyle, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson, Arizona, for the defendants-appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV-96-00288-WDB

Before: Joseph T. Sneed, Mary M. Schroeder, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 236 F.3d 1009 SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

1

The opinion filed December 29, 2000 is amended as follows: at page 4510 of the slip opinion, lines 5-6 from the bottom, after the cite to City of Chicago v. Morales, add the parenthetical "(plurality)", so that it reads: City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 52 , 119 S.Ct. 1849 , 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999) (plurality).

2

The mandate may now issue.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999) 1,178
Forbes v. Napolitano, 260 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2001) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list