Morris v. State
Stephen Marco MORRIS v. STATE of Florida
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
We affirm Stephen Marco Morris’s convictions and sentences for two counts of dealing in stolen property; however, we reverse the imposition of a special condition of Morris’s probation which required him to pay $60 to First Step of Volusia County because this condition was not orally pronounced at sentencing, see Shaddix v. State, 599 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and because the trial court failed to reference the statutory authority for the imposition of such costs. See Gedeon v. State, 636 So.2d 178 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Thomas v. State, 633 So.2d 1122 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), rev. denied, 640 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1994). This reversal is without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition of such costs after Morris has been given adequate notice and opportunity to be heard on the matter. See Williams v. State, 580 So.2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). If the trial court does reimpose such costs on remand, the trial court shall reference the statutory authority for the imposition of such costs.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON, J„ concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.