Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co.
Roy and Tammy PICARD v. ZEIT EXPLORATION CO., INC.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In re Picard, Roy; Picard, Tammy; Security Life Ins. Co.; Frederick, Cleve & Tank Co. Inc.; Cleve Frederick & Son Tank Co.;— Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86,203; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW92 2242.
Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the trial court denying summary judgment is reinstated. See Malloy v. Bryan E. Talbot Contractor, Inc., 94-1148 (La. 7/1/94); 639 So.2d 1181 (La.1994); Hanks v. Shell Oil Co., 94-0483 (La. 4/4/94); 635 So.2d 1118 (La.1994); Moore v. Crystal Oil Co., 93-3103 (La. 2/5/94); 632 So.2d 758 (La.1994). Case re *863 manded to the district court for further proceedings.
CALOGERO, C.J., and HALL, J., would grant the writ and docket. DENNIS, J., not on panel.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.