United States v. Tanh Huu Lam, Order And
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tanh Huu LAM, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ORDER The panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for rehearing except that it directs that two corrections pointed out in the petition be made:
At slip op. 6888, the first sentence in the second full paragraph is deleted and the following substituted in its stead:
“Lam was retried on the same indictment. The Government on December 18, 1998 filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty.”
At slip op. 6893, delete the text of footnote 7 and place in its stead:
“Staniels was appointed counsel from the Federal Defenders Office of the Eastern District of California.”
The clerk is directed to re-file the opinion with the indicated corrections.
Judges O’Scannlain and Gould vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge B. Fletcher so recommends.
The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court and no active member of the court has voted for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(finding that a delay of approximately 14 1/2 months weighed “slightly” in favor of the defendant in a Barker analysis)
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.