TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Stephens

In re Eddie L. STEPHENS

In re Stephens, 645 So. 2d 1133 (La. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 18, 1994
Docket
No. 94-B-1924
Citations
645 So. 2d 11331994 La. LEXIS 27491994 WL 658640

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS |1PER CURIAM. 1

Respondent, Eddie L. Stephens, was formally charged with failing to keep his client informed and notarizing a forged affidavit before filing it into the court record, in violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3, 1.4, 3.3(a), 3.4(b), 4.1(a) and (b), and 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d).

The facts developed at the hearing indicated that respondent was retained to defend the St. Michael’s Spiritual Temple of Faith of Baton Rouge in connection with a suit for non-payment of a loan. After filing an answer in the suit, respondent had very little contact with his client. Later in the litigation, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. In order to create a material issue of fact, respondent notarized and caused to be filed into the civil litigation an affidavit purporting to be the sworn statement of the Reverend Dorothy Powell. Shortly after formal charges were filed, respondent began serving a one-year suspension for an unrelated disciplinary violation involving the commingling and conversion of client funds.

In light of the above evidence, the hearing committee recommended that respondent be suspended for one year and one day, while the disciplinary board recommended that respondent be suspended for 18 months.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Eddie L. Stephens be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 18 months to run consecutively from the suspension he began serving on October 1, |21993 in the matter of In Re: Eddie L. Stephens, Supreme Court No. 93-B-0939. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent, and reinstatement is conditioned upon their payment.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.

. Marcus, J., not on the panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1998: 11999: 12003: 12006: 12007: 22009: 12013: 119982026peak 2007 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Stephens722 So. 2d 1001 (La. 1998)
  2. In re Sealed194 F.3d 666 (5th Cir. 1999)
  3. In re Stephens955 So. 2d 140 (La. 2007)
  4. In re Warner851 So. 2d 1029 (La. 2003)
  5. In re Bruno956 So. 2d 577 (La. 2007)
  6. In re Jones106 So. 3d 1019 (La. 2013)

Most recent

  1. In re Jones106 So. 3d 1019 (La. 2013)
  2. In re Meisner11 So. 3d 1096 (La. 2009)
  3. In re Bruno956 So. 2d 577 (La. 2007)
  4. In re Stephens955 So. 2d 140 (La. 2007)
  5. In re Calahan930 So. 2d 916 (La. 2006)
  6. In re Warner851 So. 2d 1029 (La. 2003)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list