TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis

Emanuel M. SISTRUNK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Nicholas ARMENAKIS, Respondent-Appellee

Sistrunk v. Armenakis, 279 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 31, 2002
Docket
No. 99-36000
Judges
Schroeder
Citations
279 F.3d 10632002 Daily Journal DAR 12002002 WL 1804152002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9412002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432

Opinion — Schroeder

ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1

it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

1

. Judge Graber was recused.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2002: 120022026peak 2002 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis292 F.3d 669 (9th Cir. 2002)

Most recent

  1. Emanuel M. Sistrunk v. Nicholas Armenakis292 F.3d 669 (9th Cir. 2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list