TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Gates

In re Gordon Pearse GATES

In re Gates, 686 So. 2d 816 (La. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 10, 1997
Docket
No. 96-B-0465
Citations
686 So. 2d 8161997 La. LEXIS 2101997 WL 11238

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. *

Respondent, an attorney licensed to practice law in Maine and Louisiana, was the subject of bar discipline proceedings in Maine involving ten complaints based on his neglect of legal matters entrusted to him. 1 On August 11, 1995, the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with reinstatement conditioned upon restitution and other conditions, such as seeking counseling and treatment for his avoidance problem.

On the showing made by disciplinary counsel regarding the disciplinary proceedings in the State of Maine, and considering that respondent was given thirty days to respond to disciplinary counsel’s filing, but did not do so, and in light of the provisions of La.Sup. Ct. Rule XIX, § 21 regarding reciprocal discipline, it is the decision of the court that the same discipline imposed in Maine be imposed in Louisiana. Accordingly, it is ordered that Gordon Pearse Gates is suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of one year, under the same terms as his suspension from the practice of law in Maine.

Johnson, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

. Six of these involved domestic matters, one involved a title search, one involved a criminal charge of illegal attachment of a license plate, one involved an appeal of a murder conviction, and one involved a collection matter.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

  • (suspending an attorney for one year, with his reinstatement conditioned upon him "seeking counseling and treatment for his avoidance problem" in a reciprocal disciplinary matter)
2019: 120192026peak 2019 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Judge Russell211 A.3d 426 (Md. 2019)

Most recent

  1. In re Judge Russell211 A.3d 426 (Md. 2019)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list