TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fleitas v. Union Chelsea National Bank

Nicolas FLEITAS and Mary Fleitas v. UNION CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK

Fleitas v. Union Chelsea Nat'l Bank, 687 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 29, 1997
Docket
No. 96-1450
Judges
Fletcher, Nesbitt, Schwartz
Citations
687 So. 2d 9111997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2721997 WL 30919

Opinion of the Court — Schwartz

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The Florida Insurance Guarantee Association issued a check drawn on a Florida NationsBank account payable to the Fleitases and their agent for Hurricane Andrew damages to their home. The Fleitases never saw the money, however, because the check was deposited in the Union Chelsea National Bank, a New York institution, by someone who absconded with the funds. In this action on the cheek by the Fleitases against both banks, see Larkin General Hosp., Ltd. v. Bank of Florida, 464 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Florida Bar v. Allstate Ins. Co., 391 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), pet. for review denied, 399 So.2d 1140 (Fla.1981), the trial court dismissed the action as against Union Chelsea 1 for lack of jurisdiction over its person. We agree that the actions of the New York bank in accepting the Florida cheek, initiating its collection through the normal Federal Reserve clearing house process, and paying the proceeds — all of which occurred in New York — did not, contrary to the plaintiffs’ assertions, subject it to the long-arm jurisdiction of the Florida court. §§ 48.181, 193(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); see Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1390 , 113 L.Ed.2d 447 (1991); Oriental Imports and Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel’s Bank, N.V., 701 F.2d 889 (11th Cir.1983); Gateway Leasing, Inc. v. American Bank, 577 F.Supp. 908 (D.Md.1984); First United Bank of Mississippi v. First Nat’l Bank of Atlanta, 255 Ga. 505 , 340 S.E.2d 597 (1986); Eferakeya v. Twin City State Bank, 245 Kan. 154 , 777 P.2d 759 (1989).

Affirmed.

. The case proceeds below against NationsBank.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2004: 12012: 120042026peak 2004 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Baptichon v. Nevada State Bank304 F. Supp. 2d 451 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)
  2. Geissler v. State90 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Most recent

  1. Geissler v. State90 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
  2. Baptichon v. Nevada State Bank304 F. Supp. 2d 451 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 8

DepthCaseCited by
First United Bank of Miss. v. First Nat'l Bank, 340 S.E.2d 597 (Ga. 1986) 27
Eferakeya v. Twin City State Bank, 777 P.2d 759 (Kan. 1989) 4
Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. Banque Paribas (Suisse), S. A., 499 U.S. 937 (1991) 57
Oriental Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Maduro & Curiel's Bank, 701 F.2d 889 (11th Cir. 1983) 51
Jet Charter Serv., Inc. v. W. Koeck, 907 F.2d 1110 (11th Cir. 1990) 50
The Fla. Bar v. Allstate Ins. Co., 391 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980) 8
Gateway Leasing, Inc. v. Am. Bank, 577 F. Supp. 908 (D. Maryland 1984) 4
Larkin Gen. Hosp. v. Bank of Fla., 464 So. 2d 635 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list