TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Richard Bell

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard BELL, Appellant

United States v. Bell, 310 F.3d 604 (8th Cir. 2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 15, 2002
Docket
No. 02-2761
Judges
Hansen, Beam, Riley
Citations
310 F.3d 6042002 WL 315264952002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23579

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

After Richard Bell pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), the district court 1

sentenced him to eighty-four months in prison and three years of supervised release. Bell renews on appeal the objection he raised below: that his offense level should not have been enhanced under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(b)(5) (2001) for possessing the firearm in connection with another felony offense. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

The unobjected-to facts in the presen-tence report show that, when authorities executed a search warrant at Bell’s apartment, he was lying on the bed in the bedroom. A loaded revolver was recovered from beneath the mattress he was lying on, and a quantity of slightly more than two grams of cocaine base was found with rolling papers in a pair of shorts on the bedroom floor. Bell does not dispute that his possession of the cocaine base constitutes another felony offense.

We review for clear error the district court’s finding as to Bell’s purpose in possessing the firearm, see United States v. Chavarria-Cabrera, 272 F.3d 1049, 1050 (8th Cir.2001), and we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Bell possessed the revolver in connection with his possession of the cocaine base, see United States v. Martinez, 258 F.3d 760, 761-62 (8th Cir.2001) (a de *606 fendant’s simultaneous possession of a firearm and a personal-use quantity of drugs, or the proximity of the firearm to the drugs, supports a § 2K2.1(b)(5) enhancement because the defendant has the potential to use the firearm to protect himself or his drugs).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

1

. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

2003: 12004: 12005: 22007: 12015: 220032026peak 2005 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Harold Glenn Agee, Also Known as Buck Agee333 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 2003)
  2. United States v. Stephen Curtner116 F. App'x 42 (8th Cir. 2004)
  3. United States v. Carl Amburn, Jr.412 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 2005)
  4. United States v. Barela102 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (D.N.M. 2015)
  5. United States v. Cole497 F. Supp. 2d 958 (N.D. Iowa 2007)
  6. United States v. Timmey Dean Hale138 F. App'x 878 (8th Cir. 2005)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Tobanche115 F. Supp. 3d 1339 (D.N.M. 2015)
  2. United States v. Barela102 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (D.N.M. 2015)
  3. United States v. Cole497 F. Supp. 2d 958 (N.D. Iowa 2007)
  4. United States v. Timmey Dean Hale138 F. App'x 878 (8th Cir. 2005)
  5. United States v. Carl Amburn, Jr.412 F.3d 909 (8th Cir. 2005)
  6. United States v. Stephen Curtner116 F. App'x 42 (8th Cir. 2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Martinez, 258 F.3d 760 (8th Cir. 2001) 15
United States v. Chavarria-Cabrera, 272 F.3d 1049 (8th Cir. 2001) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list