Ginny v. White Jimmie D
Ginny v. WHITE; Jimmie D. White, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Orscheln Company, a Missouri Corporation, Defendant
Opinion
ORDER The majority opinion filed on December 3, 2002, is amended as follows.
At page 18, lines 19-21 of the slip opinion, delete the sentence ‘We need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case, because we reverse on other grounds.” Also, delete footnote 26, referred to at the end of that sentence. Substitute the sentence, “Nevertheless, we cannot say that the district judge abused his discretion in allowing the opinion into evidence in this case.”
With these amendments, the petition for rehearing is denied. No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(describing metallurgist’s testimony that was “well within his metallurgical expertise” when he “identified wear on the ratchet wheel of the brake that showed repeated tip-on-tip engagement rather than the proper engagement”)
Cited by 34 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Hidalgo County, Texas v. Dora Herrera, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Reynaldo Herrera, Eric Herrera, Efren Herrera, Michael Herrera, Jessica Herrera Rodriguez, Celia Herrera, Vanessa Herrera, Veronica Herrera Rodriguez Herrera, and Rey Herrera
- United States v. $225,850.00 in U.S. Currency
- Feindt v. United States
- Feindt v. United States
- Feindt v. United States
- Grenier v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.