Juan Monjaraz-Munoz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Juan MONJARAZ-MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Monjaraz-Munoz v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir. 2003)
Opinion
ORDER The opinion filed on April 28, 2003, and found at 327 F.3d 892 , is hereby amended. The last paragraph, on page 398, is deleted and replaced with the following text:
The petition for review is GRANTED. We REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
With this amendment, Respondent’s petition for rehearing is DENIED.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(explaining that an agency’s findings are upheld “unless the evidence presented would compel a reasonable finder of fact to reach a contrary result”)
Cited by 36 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Israel Sanchez Rosales v. William Barr
- Fong Yang Lo, AKA Fong Yang Yu Bin Lo v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General
- Galyna Semienovna Halaim and Mariya Semienovna Halaim v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Dinko Ivanov Mihalev v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
- Jorge Ibarra-Flores v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
- Haifa Saleh El Himri Musab El Himri v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.