Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Jerome Feitelberg, on Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, and the General Public v. Merrill Lynch & Co., a Delaware Corporation Thomas Mazzucco Henry Blodget
Opinion
353 F.3d 765
Jerome FEITELBERG, On Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, And The General Public, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., a Delaware Corporation; Thomas Mazzucco; Henry Blodget, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 02-17236.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003 — San Francisco, California.
Filed December 24, 2003.
Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.
Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, California, for the Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP.
Before: Myron H. BRIGHT, * Dorothy W. NELSON, and Pamela Ann RYMER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
1
We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal.2002). * 2
AFFIRMED.
Notes:
* Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation * We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch's request for sanctions
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.