Gilbertson v. Albright
PAUL DOUGLAS GILBERTSON, — v. STUART H. ALBRIGHT KEITH R. BATTLESON JACK W. BURRIS SUZANNE T. CRANE CHARLES L. CRUMP YOLANDA I. GURAN-POSTLETHWAITE CHARLES W. HESTER RON A. HOFFINE ROBERT v. NEATHAMER R. CHARLES PEARSON RONALD E. STUNTZNER DAVID P. TAYLOR ROBERT A. WALKER RICHARD H. ZBINDEN, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, —
Opinion
368 F.3d 1062
Paul Douglas GILBERTSON, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Stuart H. ALBRIGHT; Keith R. Battleson; Jack W. Burris; Suzanne T. Crane; Charles L. Crump; Yolanda I. Guran-Postlethwaite; Charles W. Hester; Ron A. Hoffine; Robert V. Neathamer; R. Charles Pearson; Ronald E. Stuntzner; David P. Taylor; Robert A. Walker; Richard H. Zbinden, in their individual capacities, Defendants — Appellees.
No. 02-35460.
D.C. No. CV-01-06282-HO.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 17, 2004.
Daniel W. Dickerson, Esq., Portland, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Richard D. Wasserman, AAG, Office of the Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
ORDER 1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.