TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Allan J. Favish v. National Archives and Records Administration, Sheila Foster Anthony Lisa Foster Moody

Allan J. Favish v. National Archives and Records Administration, Sheila Foster Anthony Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-Appellees. Allan J. Favish v. National Archives and Records Administration, Sheila Foster Anthony Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-Appellants. Allan J. Favish v. National Archives and Records Administration, and Sheila Foster Anthony Lisa Foster Moody, Defendants-Intervenors

Favish v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., Sheila Foster Anthony Lisa Foster Moody, 368 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 20, 2004
Docket
No. 01-55487
Citations
368 F.3d 1072

Opinion

368 F.3d 1072

Allan J. FAVISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, * Defendant-Appellee, Sheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-Appellees. Allan J. Favish, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Archives and Records Administration, * Defendant, Sheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Intervenors-Appellants. Allan J. Favish, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Archives and Records Administration, * Defendant-Appellant, and Sheila Foster Anthony; Lisa Foster Moody, Defendants-Intervenors.

No. 01-55487.

No. 01-55788.

No. 01-55789.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 20, 2004.

Allan J. Favish, Santa Clarita, CA, pro se.

James Hamilton, Esq., Washington, DC, G. Andrew Lundberg, Esq., Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, CA, for Intervenors-Appellees/Intervenors-Appellants/Defendants-intervenors.

Robert M. Loeb, Esq., Leonard Schaitman, Esq., Washington, DC, Jan L. Luymes, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee/Defendant/Defendant-Appellant.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before PREGERSON, NOONAN and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER 1

The case is remanded to the district court to enter judgment for the National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 1570 , 158 L.Ed.2d 319 (2004).

Notes:

* Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion in National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish, filed on March 30, 2004, National Archives and Records Administration has been substituted for Office of Independent Counsel.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 875
Favish v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 368 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2004) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list