Reliable Finance Co. v. Rhodes
RELIABLE FINANCE COMPANY v. James H. R RHODES
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM In disposing of this rather complicated case the trial court made seven separate findings, some of law, some of fact, some of mixed law and fact. The decree of the chancellor is not abstracted and therefore we are left without the benefit of those conclusions. The omissioh violates our Rule 9 (d) because an abstract of thé decree in this case is “necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision..."Tudor v. Tudor, 247 Ark. 822 , 448 S.W. 2d 17 (1969); Weir v. Hill, 237 Ark. 922 , 377 S.W. 2d 178 (1964); Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 237 Ark. 797 , 376 S.W. 2d 555 (1964); Davidson v. Messing, 214 Ark. 227 , 215 S.W. 2d 138 (1949); Ransom v. Warner, 193 Ark. 1179 , 103 S.W. 2d 629 (1937).
Affirmed under Rule 9 (d).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.