United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-Jasso
Subsequent history: on reh'g en banc, United States v. Navarro-Vargas, No. 02-50663 (9th Cir. May 23, 2005). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion
382 F.3d 920
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve NAVARRO-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio Leon-Jasso, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 02-50663.
No. 03-50009.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
August 25, 2004.
Patrick K. O'Toole, AUSA, David Mitchell, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew C. Winter, Federal Defender's Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
1
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, these cases are ordered reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35.3. The three-judge panel opinion in No. 02-50663 shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
2
It is further ordered that these cases be consolidated for rehearing.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.