Sherrod v. State
Bruce SHERROD v. STATE of Arkansas
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam. On May 24, 1982, we granted the appellant Bruce Sherrod permission to proceed pro se on appeal. Sherrod was notified that the appellant’s brief was due July 3. When no brief was filed by that date, appellant was twice notified of the need to file a motion for permission to file a belated brief. He did not file the motion. On September 9, the State filed the motion to dismiss appeal which is now before us. Appellant responded with a motion for extension of time to file a belated brief. We find no good cause in appellant’s motion for his delay.
The motion to dismiss appeal is granted. Appellant has been afforded every opportunity to file his brief. His failure to file a brief and his inexcusable delay in filing a motion to file a belated brief must be considered a waiver of his right to appeal.
Motion granted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.