TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Springdale v. Jones

CITY OF SPRINGDALE v. Timothy P. JONES

City of Springdale v. Jones, 747 S.W.2d 98 (Ark. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 28, 1988
Docket
No. 87-321
Judges
Hickman
Citations
747 S.W.2d 98295 Ark. 1291988 Ark. LEXIS 100

Opinion of the Court — Hickman

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Darrell Hickman, Justice. The City of Springdale is located primarily in Washington County, Arkansas, but its city limits extend into adjacent Benton County. The question is whether the municipal court of the City of Springdale has jurisdiction over criminal offenses committed in Benton County. The answer is no. The Arkansas Constitution prevents it.

The facts are not disputed. Timothy Jones was arrested for DWI in the city limits of Springdale, Benton County. This case was originally filed in Springdale Municipal Court, located in Washington County. Evidently the voters of the city from both counties elect the municipal judge.

After Jones was convicted, he appealed to the Washington County Circuit Court. The judge stated he would consider an oral motion for a writ of prohibition which was made by Jones and granted. The judge concluded the municipal court had no jurisdiction over offenses occurring in Benton County. He was right.

Article 2 § 10 of the Arkansas Constitution provides in part:

In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by impartial jury of the county in which the crime shall have been committed;

The City of Springdale asks us on appeal to solve the dilemma it finds itself in. We cannot consider a question raised for the first time on appeal and do not give advisory opinions. Mitchell v. First Nat’l Bank in Stuttgart, 293 Ark. 558 , 739 S.W.2d 682 (1987); Cummings v. City of Fayetteville, 294 Ark. 151 , 741 S.W.2d 638 (1987).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 21993: 22002: 12003: 12009: 119882026peak 1988 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sexson v. Municipal Court849 S.W.2d 468 (Ark. 1993)
  2. Opinion No.(Ark. Att'y Gen. Apr. 17, 2009)
  3. Johnson v. State863 S.W.2d 305 (Ark. 1993)
  4. Griffin v. State760 S.W.2d 852 (Ark. 1988)
  5. Magnus v. Carr86 S.W.3d 867 (Ark. 2002) · Concurrence
  6. Dust v. State759 S.W.2d 569 (Ark. Ct. App. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Opinion No.(Ark. Att'y Gen. Apr. 17, 2009)
  2. Opinion No.(Ark. Att'y Gen. Oct. 17, 2003)
  3. Magnus v. Carr86 S.W.3d 867 (Ark. 2002) · Concurrence
  4. Johnson v. State863 S.W.2d 305 (Ark. 1993)
  5. Sexson v. Municipal Court849 S.W.2d 468 (Ark. 1993)
  6. Griffin v. State760 S.W.2d 852 (Ark. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Cummings v. City of Fayetteville, 741 S.W.2d 638 (Ark. 1987) 14
Mitchell v. First Nat'l Bank, 739 S.W.2d 682 (Ark. 1987) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list