TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Diaz v. Gates

DAVID DIAZ v. DARYL GATES WILLIE L. WILLIAMS RICHARD ALARCON RICHARD ALATORRE HAL BERNSON MARVIN BRAUDE LAURA CHICK JOHN FERRARO MICHAEL FEUER RUTH GALANTER NATE HOLDEN, AND BERNARD C. PARKS, CHIEF OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, —

Diaz v. Gates, 389 F.3d 869 (9th Cir. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 18, 2004
Docket
No. 02-56818
Citations
389 F.3d 8692004 WL 26345662004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24073

Opinion

389 F.3d 869

David DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daryl GATES; Willie L. Williams; Richard Alarcon; Richard Alatorre; Hal Bernson; Marvin Braude; Laura Chick; John Ferraro; Michael Feuer; Ruth Galanter; Nate Holden, et al., Defendants, and Bernard C. PARKS, Chief of Los Angeles Police Department, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 02-56818.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 18, 2004.

Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Janet G. Bogigian, Amy Jo Field, Deputy City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER. Chief Judge.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judges O'Scannlain and Fisher are recused

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 220052026peak 2005 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diaz v. Gates420 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2005)
  2. Diaz v. Parks420 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2005)

Most recent

  1. Diaz v. Gates420 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2005)
  2. Diaz v. Parks420 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list