TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Yervin K. Barnett

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yervin K. BARNETT, Defendant-Appellant

United States v. Barnett, 400 F.3d 481 (6th Cir. 2005)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 9, 2005
Docket
No. 04-5252
Judges
Boggs, Martin, Gwin
Citations
400 F.3d 4812005 WL 5492472005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3971

Opinion

ORDER Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 35(c), less than a majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service having voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc, the request for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel concludes that the issues raised in the request were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, rehearing is denied.

The appellee’s motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 52006: 120052026peak 2005 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. HudsonNo. 04-5096 (6th Cir. Apr. 22, 2005)
  2. United States v. Scotty Lee Hudson405 F.3d 425 (6th Cir. 2005)
  3. United States v. Gorostieta134 F. App'x 802 (6th Cir. 2005)
  4. United States v. Krushinski131 F. App'x 478 (6th Cir. 2005)
  5. United States v. Lewis157 F. App'x 803 (6th Cir. 2005)
  6. United States v. DykesNo. 03-6109 (6th Cir. Apr. 14, 2006)

Most recent

  1. United States v. DykesNo. 03-6109 (6th Cir. Apr. 14, 2006)
  2. United States v. Lewis157 F. App'x 803 (6th Cir. 2005)
  3. United States v. Krushinski131 F. App'x 478 (6th Cir. 2005)
  4. United States v. Gorostieta134 F. App'x 802 (6th Cir. 2005)
  5. United States v. Scotty Lee Hudson405 F.3d 425 (6th Cir. 2005)
  6. United States v. HudsonNo. 04-5096 (6th Cir. Apr. 22, 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list