Diamond v. Marcinek

James B. Diamond v. George Marcinek

Diamond v. Marcinek, 612 A.2d 55 (Conn. 1992)

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided: July 9, 1992
Citations: 612 A.2d 55223 Conn. 9101992 Conn. LEXIS 289

Cited by 2

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 353 , is granted, limited to the following question:

“In the circumstances of this case, was the plaintiff entitled to rescission and restitution relating to rescission because of the defendants’ failure to disclose the existence of a service station in violation of General Statutes §§ 22a-134 or 22a-134a or applicable administrative regulations?”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Diamond v. Marcinek629 A.2d 350 (Conn. 1993)
Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman619 A.2d 853 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)

Most recent

Diamond v. Marcinek629 A.2d 350 (Conn. 1993)
Holly Hill Holdings v. Lowman619 A.2d 853 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Diamond v. Marcinek, 606 A.2d 1001 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992)	9

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list