TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Summerville v. Warden

Robert Summerville v. Warden, State Prison

Summerville v. Warden, 617 A.2d 172 (Conn. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 25, 1992
Docket
No. SC 14649
Citations
617 A.2d 172224 Conn. 9181992 Conn. LEXIS 415

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The petitioner Robert Summerville’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 162 (AC 10114), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that it should not decide the issue of whether an ineffective investigation by a defense expert witness in a fashion that impairs the petitioner’s defense is impugned to the defense attorney?”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 119942026peak 1994 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Summerville v. Warden, State Prison641 A.2d 1356 (Conn. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Summerville v. Warden, State Prison641 A.2d 1356 (Conn. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Summerville v. Warden, 614 A.2d 842 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992) 27

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list