TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.

Joseph L. Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc. Granby Holdings, Inc. v. Daniel L. Lynch

Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., 635 A.2d 1230 (Conn. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 3, 1993
Docket
No. SC 14868
Citations
635 A.2d 1230228 Conn. 9131993 Conn. LEXIS 422

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The petition of Granby Holdings, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 574 (AC 11222), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court was correct under the circumstance of this case in holding that a jury finding for the plaintiff Daniel Lynch, together with an award of zero damages, was required to be set aside and remanded for a new trial?”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1994: 119942026peak 1994 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.644 A.2d 325 (Conn. 1994)

Most recent

  1. Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.644 A.2d 325 (Conn. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc., 630 A.2d 609 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list