TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Danziger v. Shaknaitis

Stewart S. Danziger v. Ida J. Shaknaitis

Danziger v. Shaknaitis, 636 A.2d 846 (Conn. 1993)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 22, 1993
Docket
No. SC 14872
Citations
636 A.2d 846228 Conn. 9141993 Conn. LEXIS 454

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The plaintiff Rita Johnson’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 6 (AC 12009), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff’s motion to amend the return date, having been filed after the original return date, could not be granted pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-72?” * It is hereby ordered, sua sponte, that the judgment of the Appellate Court in the captioned matter be summarily reversed in light of this court’s decision in Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618, 626 (1994), and the case is remanded to that court with direction to remand the case to the trial court with direction to vacate its order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to Rita Johnson. July 7, 1994.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Bd. of Tax Review, 642 A.2d 1186 (Conn. 1994) 127
Danziger v. Shaknaitis, 632 A.2d 1130 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993) 25

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list