TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Washington Trust Co. v. Smith

WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY v. MARIE D. SMITH

Wash. Trust Co. v. Smith, 682 A.2d 1014 (Conn. 1996)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1996
Docket
No. SC 15529
Citations
682 A.2d 1014239 Conn. 9191996 Conn. LEXIS 388

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The petition by the proposed defendant Spicer Plus, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 330 (AC 13416), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that movants Spicer Plus, Inc., and John Holstein were not entitled to intervene because (1) they had not met their *920 burden of proving their interests in the property, and (2) they had not filed their motion to intervene in a timely manner?”

Decided September 18, 1996 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15529. William F. Gallagher and Cynthia C. Bott, in support of the petition. Francis J. Pavetti, in opposition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1997: 119972026peak 1997 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Washington Trust Co. v. Smith699 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1997)

Most recent

  1. Washington Trust Co. v. Smith699 A.2d 73 (Conn. 1997)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Wash. Trust Co. v. Smith, 680 A.2d 988 (Conn. App. Ct. 1996) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list