State v. Braswell
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MELVIN D. BRASWELL
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Opinion PER CURIAM.
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case *249 should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted. 1
The appeal is dismissed.
We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court; State v. Braswell, 42 Conn. App. 264 , 679 A.2d 973 (1996); limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly held that the defendant’s conviction and consecutive sentence for attempted sale of narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b) and 53a-49 (a) and attempted delivery of narcotics to an inmate of a correctional institution in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-174 (a) and 53a-49 (a) did not violate principles of double jeopardy?” State v. Braswell, 239 Conn. 917 , 682 A.2d 1006 (1996).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.