State v. Preston
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN PRESTON
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 778 (AC 15834), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the evidence in this case, the third and fourth prongs of State v. Whistnant, 179 Conn. 576, 588 (1980), were satisfied, in that the trial court was required to give a charge on the lesser included offense of larceny in the sixth degree?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.