Yeong Gil Kim v. Magnotta
YEONG GIL KIM v. DOMINICK MAGNOTTA
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 203 (AC 16509), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court that it lacked jurisdiction to order rescission of the stipulated agreement between the parties?”
BERDON and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.