Russell v. Commissioner of Correction
EUGENE RUSSELL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The petitioner Eugene Russell’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 52 (AC 16711), is denied.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
BERDON, J.,
dissenting. I would grant the petitioner’s petition for certification to appeal on the following issues:
“1. Did the habeas court abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner certification to appeal on the grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as a result of a conflict of interest based upon a violation of the trial attorney’s duty of loyalty?
“2. If so, is the petitioner required to prove the second prong of Strickland 1 — that is, as a result of the conflict of interest his defense was prejudiced — in order to be granted a new trial?“ 2
LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided September 29, 1998 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984).
Phillips v. Warden, 220 Conn. 112, 132-33 , 595 A.2d 1356 (1991) (“[w]here . . . the defendant claims that his counsel was ‘burdened by an actual conflict of interest’ ... the defendant need not establish actual prejudice” [citation omitted]).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.