Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
PELAGIA KITMIRIDES v. MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 729 (AC 21113), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff, listed as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declaration page of the automobile policy issued by the defendant, but not listed as a named insured, was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the policy?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.