Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital
CHARLES D. GIANETTI v. NORWALK HOSPITAL
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The petition of the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 218 (AC 20197), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was a ‘lost volume seller?’
*946 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16640. Robert A. Lacobelle, in support of the petition. William F. Gallagher, in opposition. Decided December 4, 2001
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was not required to mitigate damages, and that he was entitled to more than nominal damages?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.