Pekera v. Purpora
DANIEL R. PEKERA, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHARLENE WALKER) v. DAVID PURPORA
Pekera v. Purpora, 841 A.2d 1191 (Conn. 2004)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 685 (AC 23546), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint?”
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.