TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Beucler v. Lloyd

ROBERT BEUCLER v. MICHAEL J. LLOYD

Beucler v. Lloyd, 859 A.2d 567 (Conn. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 2004
Docket
No. SC 17260
Citations
859 A.2d 567271 Conn. 9132004 Conn. LEXIS 378

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 731 (AC 24158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the notice requirement in the parties’ construction contract did not comport with the plaintiffs’ warranty rights *914 under the New Home Warranties Act, General Statutes § 47-116 et seq.?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17260. Decided September 15, 2004 Robert W. Smith, in support of the petition. Scott R. McCarthy, in opposition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2005: 120052026peak 2005 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Beucler v. Lloyd870 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2005)

Most recent

  1. Beucler v. Lloyd870 A.2d 468 (Conn. 2005)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Beucler v. Lloyd, 851 A.2d 358 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list