TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Doe v. Christoforo

JOHN DOE v. JOHN M. CHRISTOFORO

Doe v. Christoforo, 871 A.2d 1027 (Conn. 2005)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 31, 2005
Docket
No. SC 17400
Citations
871 A.2d 1027273 Conn. 9202005 Conn. LEXIS 132

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 359 (AC 23908), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*921 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17400. William F. Gallagher and Da,vid McCarry, in support of the petition. Eric J. Stockman and Maureen Sullivan Dinnan, in opposition. Decided March 31, 2005

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly excluded the defendant’s statement from evidence?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Doe v. Christoforo, 865 A.2d 444 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list