TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil

MIDDLESEX MUTUAL ASSURANCE COMPANY v. BRIAN VASZIL

Middlesex Mut. Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 882 A.2d 673 (Conn. 2005)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Connecticut · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 12, 2005
Docket
No. SC 17493
Citations
882 A.2d 673275 Conn. 911

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The petition by the defendants Brian Vaszil and Robert Vaszil for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 482 (AC 25437), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff was entitled to subrogation for the fire loss under the circumstances of this case?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2006: 120062026peak 2006 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil900 A.2d 513 (Conn. 2006)

Most recent

  1. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. Vaszil900 A.2d 513 (Conn. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Middlesex Mut. Assurance Co. v. Vaszil, 873 A.2d 1030 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005) 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list