TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hobby v. Feldman

Leslie Hobby v. Robert S. Feldman

Hobby v. Feldman, 482 A.2d 1226 (Conn. App. Ct. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Connecticut Appellate Court · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 13, 1984
Docket
No. 2268
Citations
482 A.2d 12262 Conn. App. 6961984 Conn. App. LEXIS 710

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs, by their complaint, sought a judgment declaring invalid the mortgage held by the defendants on the real property of the plaintiffs. The defendants, by their counterclaim, sought damages from the plaintiffs for failure to pay amounts due under an agreement. The agreement created the obligation for which the mortgage held by the defendants was security. The trial court issued a factually detailed memorandum of decision and rendered judgment for the defendants on the complaint and on the counterclaim. We have carefully considered the claims of error of the *697 plaintiffs on appeal 1 and find them to be without merit. They amount to an attempt to persuade us to retry the facts found by the trial court, which are amply supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous.

There is no error.

This appeal, originally filed in the Supreme Court, was transferred to this court. Public Acts, Spec. Sess., June, 1983, No. 83-29, § 2 (c).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1984: 11985: 319842026peak 1985 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Leabo v. Leninski484 A.2d 239 (Conn. App. Ct. 1984)
  2. Halepas v. Malerba488 A.2d 847 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
  3. Shetucket Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Solar Processes, Inc.490 A.2d 93 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
  4. MacArthur/Nathan Associates v. Edson Realty, Inc.491 A.2d 1111 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)

Most recent

  1. MacArthur/Nathan Associates v. Edson Realty, Inc.491 A.2d 1111 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
  2. Shetucket Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Solar Processes, Inc.490 A.2d 93 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
  3. Halepas v. Malerba488 A.2d 847 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985)
  4. Leabo v. Leninski484 A.2d 239 (Conn. App. Ct. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list