Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Katske
Connecticut Bank and Trust Company v. Sylvan Katske
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment of strict foreclosure in favor of the plaintiff on a mortgage securing a guaranty on a note in the principal amount of $218,700. The defendants asserted special defenses alleging unconscionable acts and violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act by the plaintiff.
The sole issue of this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that the defendants had failed to sustain their burden of proof on the special defenses.
The trial court filed a detailed memorandum of decision; Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Katske, 40 Conn. Sup. 560 , 535 A.2d 836 (1987); which adequately discusses the facts and sole issue. After examining the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that no further articulation of the law or facts is necessary. See Faith Center, Inc. v. Hartford, 192 Conn. 434, 436 , 472 *175 A.2d 16 (1984); Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corpo ration, 192 Conn. 252, 253 , 470 A.2d 1216 (1984). The trial court memorandum should be referred to for a detailed discussion.
There is no error. The case is remanded to the trial court to set new law days.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.