Diamond v. Simmons
Jerome H. Diamond v. Augustus J. Simmons
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The named defendant, in this appeal from a judgment of foreclosure by sale, claims that the trial court erred (1) in ordering him to proceed to trial, (2) in failing to consider his alleged alcohol problem, and (3) in finding for the plaintiff and rendering a judgment of foreclosure by sale. We see no merit to these claims.
*808 The record discloses that counsel for the named defendant did not ask for a continuance, and that the named defendant failed to preserve his claim of an alleged alcohol problem. The record fails to disclose that the trial court abused its discretion or acted other than in accordance with applicable law in determining that a judgment of foreclosure by sale should enter.
There is no error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.