Independent U.S. Tanker Owners Committee v. Skinner
INDEPENDENT U.S. TANKER OWNERS COMMITTEE v. Samuel K. SKINNER, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation American Petrofina, Incorporated, and consolidated cases
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s motion to recall and modify the mandate, the responses thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED by the court that the motion to recall and modify the mandate be granted. See Dilley v. Alexander, 627 F.2d 407, 410-11 (D.C.Cir.1980). It is
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in these cases be reversed, in accordance with the opinion of the court filed August 22, 1989 ( 884 F.2d 587 (D.C.Cir.1989)) and these cases be remanded to the District Court for resolution of appellees’ National Environmental Policy Act claims.
The Clerk is directed to issue, forthwith, a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the District Court in lieu of formal mandate.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(NHTSA conceded the relationship of car size and safety, yet did not recommend reducing CAFE restraints due to its finding that the “relationship to be more complex than petitioners were willing to concede”)
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.