TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In the Interest of T.J.T.

In the Interest of T.J.T., M.J.T., and A.C.T., Children, J.T. and S.T., Parents

In the Interest of T.J.T., 357 N.W.2d 641 (Iowa Ct. App. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Iowa · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 25, 1984
Docket
No. 84-371
Judges
Oxberger, Sackett, Snell
Citations
357 N.W.2d 6411984 Iowa App. LEXIS 1700

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The natural parents appeal from a juvenile court order terminating their parental rights with respect to three children. The termination order was signed by a juvenile court referee rather than by a judge.

Under Iowa Code § 602.7103 , a referee “shall have the same jurisdiction to conduct juvenile court proceedings and to issue orders, findings, and decisions as the judge of the juvenile court...” 1983 Iowa Acts ch. 186 § 8103 (codified at Iowa Code Supp. § 602.7103(2) (1983)). Parties to a hearing are entitled to a review by a judge of the juvenile court of the referee’s order, finding, or decision. 1983 Iowa Acts ch. 186 § 8103 (codified at Iowa Code Supp. § 602.-7103(3) (1983)). Such a review is to be requested within ten days of the referee’s order. However, in the interest of justice, a judge may allow a rehearing at any time. Id.

In this case, the parties made no request for a review of the referee’s decision. Without an order by the juvenile court judge, we hold that we do not have subject matter jurisdiction. This case is therefore remanded for the limited purpose of obtaining a review of the referee’s decision and an order from the juvenile court judge from which appeal will lie.

If the juvenile court judge affirms the referee’s decision, the clerk of court shall certify the order directly to this court for review. In the event the referee’s decision is not affirmed, the parties shall expedite such appeal as is appropriate.

REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1985: 119852026peak 1985 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In the Interest of D.W.K.365 N.W.2d 32 (Iowa 1985)

Most recent

  1. In the Interest of D.W.K.365 N.W.2d 32 (Iowa 1985)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list